From b2b5cae7e248f4bd2a5b061cc82172d89a7c6f6f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: inference
Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2023 03:39:08 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] Add licensing subsection "Do I Distinguish Between
Open-source and Free Software?"
---
about.html | 9 ++++++++-
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/about.html b/about.html
index 5fb279e..3a7a152 100644
--- a/about.html
+++ b/about.html
@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@
-
+
@@ -157,6 +157,13 @@
only restriction being the original copyright notice
must be kept in order to attribute the original creator
of the licensed content.
+
+ No. If code is not released under an open-source license and
+ places restrictions on how the code may be used, it is either
+ source-available (if viewing the code is permitted) or
+ proprietary. "Free software" only causes confusion and exists to
+ push an ideology by a specific group of people. If software
+ isn't "free", then it's not open-source, either.