Add missing licensing subsection Preferred.

This commit is contained in:
inference 2023-03-16 09:33:04 +00:00
parent e404b6ae8d
commit 7e9041bf4d
Signed by: inference
SSH Key Fingerprint: SHA256:9Pl0nZ2UJacgm+IeEtLSZ4FOESgP1eKCtRflfPfdX9M

View File

@ -5,7 +5,7 @@
<!-- Copyright 2022-2023 Jake Winters --> <!-- Copyright 2022-2023 Jake Winters -->
<!-- SPDX-License-Identifier: BSD-3-Clause-Clear --> <!-- SPDX-License-Identifier: BSD-3-Clause-Clear -->
<!-- Version: 3.2.0.55 --> <!-- Version: 3.2.0.56 -->
<html> <html>
@ -127,8 +127,10 @@
allow wider propagation of our code and allow more use cases and possibilities, as well as allow wider propagation of our code and allow more use cases and possibilities, as well as
ensuring proprietary code, whenever required, is permitted to be included.</p> ensuring proprietary code, whenever required, is permitted to be included.</p>
<br> <br>
<h3 id="licensing-bsd-3-clause-clear"><a href="#licensing-bsd-3-clause-clear" class="h3" <h3 id="licensing-preferred"><a href="#licensing-preferred" class="h3"
>BSD 3-Clause Clear License</a></h3> >Preferred</a></h3>
<h4 id="licensing-bsd-3-clause-clear"><a href="#licensing-bsd-3-clause-clear" class="h3"
>BSD 3-Clause Clear License</a></h4>
<code>SPDX-License-Identifier: BSD-3-Clause-Clear</code> <code>SPDX-License-Identifier: BSD-3-Clause-Clear</code>
<p>Type: Permissive</p> <p>Type: Permissive</p>
<br> <br>
@ -148,8 +150,8 @@
misunderstanding in regards to patents applied to code using the BSD 3-Clause "New" or misunderstanding in regards to patents applied to code using the BSD 3-Clause "New" or
"Revised" License.</p> "Revised" License.</p>
<br> <br>
<h3 id="licensing-mit"><a href="#licensing-mit" class="h3" <h4 id="licensing-mit"><a href="#licensing-mit" class="h3"
>MIT License</a></h3> >MIT License</a></h4>
<code>SPDX-License-Identifier: MIT</code> <code>SPDX-License-Identifier: MIT</code>
<p>Type: Permissive</p> <p>Type: Permissive</p>
<br> <br>
@ -165,8 +167,8 @@
>BSD 3-Clause Clear License</a>; however, MIT License is a great choice when derivatives >BSD 3-Clause Clear License</a>; however, MIT License is a great choice when derivatives
using the name of the original project and/or its contributors is a non-issue.</p> using the name of the original project and/or its contributors is a non-issue.</p>
<br> <br>
<h3 id="licensing-gpl-2.0"><a href="#licensing-gpl-2.0" class="h3" <h4 id="licensing-gpl-2.0"><a href="#licensing-gpl-2.0" class="h3"
>GNU General Public License v2.0</a></h3> >GNU General Public License v2.0</a></h4>
<code>SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only</code> <code>SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only</code>
<p>Type: Copyleft</p> <p>Type: Copyleft</p>
<br> <br>
@ -185,10 +187,10 @@
>GNU General Public License v3.0</a>, and relicensing derivatives under the GNU General >GNU General Public License v3.0</a>, and relicensing derivatives under the GNU General
Public License v3.0 will be disallowed.</p> Public License v3.0 will be disallowed.</p>
<br> <br>
<h2 id="licensing-other"><a href="#licensing-other" class="h2" <h3 id="licensing-other"><a href="#licensing-other" class="h2"
>Other</a></h2> >Other</a></h3>
<h3 id="licensing-gpl-3.0"><a href="#licensing-gpl-3.0" class="h3" <h4 id="licensing-gpl-3.0"><a href="#licensing-gpl-3.0" class="h3"
>GNU General Public License v3.0</a></h3> >GNU General Public License v3.0</a></h4>
<code>SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-3.0-only</code> <code>SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-3.0-only</code>
<p>Type: Copyleft</p> <p>Type: Copyleft</p>
<br> <br>