Update webpage "Blog - #3" from version "9.0.0-beta.1" to "9.0.1-beta.1"

This commit is contained in:
inference 2024-03-18 02:43:04 +00:00
parent 127f7311fb
commit 7dcc0e2c62
Signed by: inference
SSH Key Fingerprint: SHA256:FtEVfx1CmTKMy40VwZvF4k+3TC+QhCWy+EmPRg50Nnc

View File

@ -1,112 +1,100 @@
<!DOCTYPE html> <!DOCTYPE html>
<!-- Inferencium - Website - Blog - #3 --> <!-- Inferencium - Website - Blog - #3 -->
<!-- Version: 9.0.0-beta.1 --> <!-- Version: 9.0.1-beta.1 -->
<!-- Copyright 2022 Jake Winters --> <!-- Copyright 2022 Jake Winters -->
<!-- SPDX-License-Identifier: BSD-3-Clause --> <!-- SPDX-License-Identifier: BSD-3-Clause WITH AdditionRef-Inferencium-Personal-exception -->
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xml:lang="en" lang="en"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xml:lang="en" lang="en">
<head> <head>
<meta charset="utf-8"/> <meta charset="utf-8"/>
<meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width, initial-scale=1"/> <meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width, initial-scale=1"/>
<link rel="stylesheet" href="../main.css"/> <link rel="stylesheet" href="../main.css"/>
<link rel="icon shortcut" href="../asset/img/logo/inferencium-notext.png"/> <link rel="icon shortcut" href="../asset/img/logo/inferencium-notext.png"/>
<title>Inferencium - Blog - The Chromium Monopoly</title> <title>Inferencium - Blog - The Chromium Monopoly</title>
</head> </head>
<body> <body>
<nav class="navbar"> <nav class="navbar">
<div class="logo"><a href="../index.xhtml"><img src="../asset/img/logo/inferencium-notext.png" alt="Inferencium logo"/></a></div> <div class="logo"><a href="../index.xhtml"><img src="../asset/img/logo/inferencium-notext.png" alt="Inferencium logo"/></a></div>
<div class="title"><a href="../index.xhtml">Inferencium</a></div> <div class="title"><a href="../index.xhtml">Inferencium</a></div>
<div><a href="../about.xhtml">About</a></div> <div><a href="../about.xhtml">About</a></div>
<div><a href="../news.xhtml">News</a></div> <div><a href="../news.xhtml">News</a></div>
<div><a href="../documentation.xhtml">Documentation</a></div> <div><a href="../documentation.xhtml">Documentation</a></div>
<div><a href="../source.xhtml">Source</a></div> <div><a href="../source.xhtml">Source</a></div>
<div><a href="../changelog.xhtml">Changelog</a></div> <div><a href="../changelog.xhtml">Changelog</a></div>
<div><a href="../blog.xhtml">Blog</a></div> <div><a href="../blog.xhtml">Blog</a></div>
<div><a href="../contact.xhtml">Contact</a></div> <div><a href="../contact.xhtml">Contact</a></div>
<div><a href="../directory.xhtml">Directory</a></div> <div><a href="../directory.xhtml">Directory</a></div>
<div><a href="../key.xhtml">Key</a></div> <div><a href="../key.xhtml">Key</a></div>
<div class="sitemap"><a href="../sitemap">Sitemap</a></div> <div class="sitemap"><a href="../sitemap">Sitemap</a></div>
</nav>
<h1>Blog - #3</h1>
<h2>The Chromium Monopoly</h2>
<p class="update_date">Posted: 2022-12-20 (UTC+00:00)</p>
<p class="update_date">Updated: 2023-11-11 (UTC+00:00)</p>
<nav id="toc">
<h2><a href="#toc">Table of Contents</a></h2>
<ul>
<li><a href="#introduction">Introduction</a></li>
<li><a href="#solution">Solution</a></li>
<li><a href="#conclusion">Conclusion</a></li>
</ul>
</nav> </nav>
<h1>Blog - #3</h1> <section id="introduction">
<h2>The Chromium Monopoly</h2> <h2><a href="#introduction">Introduction</a></h2>
<p class="update_date">Posted: 2022-12-20 (UTC+00:00)</p> <p>It's no secret that I'm an advocate of Chromium and will use it for the foreseeable future.
<p class="update_date">Updated: 2023-11-11 (UTC+00:00)</p> It is a highly secure web browser which provides strong protection against malicious wesbites
<nav id="toc"> and the code they run, and, while I am not too interested in high performance, it is a very
<h2><a href="#toc">Table of Contents</a></h2> performant web browser, despite its security features.</p>
<ul> <p>However, the intention of this blog post is not to promote Chromium for any reason, but
<li><a href="#introduction">Introduction</a></li> rather show an issue with it; an issue which is larger than may be realised by web-surfing
<li><a href="#solution">Solution</a></li> users. That issue is the large monopoly Chromium has in the web browser market;
<li><a href="#conclusion">Conclusion</a></li> <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Usage_share_of_web_browsers#Summary_tables">Chromium's market share is around 65%</a>,
</ul> making it the largest slice of the cake. The issue becomes even deeper and more problematic when
</nav> you realise that the second-place web browser, Safari, has only an 18% market share.</p>
<section id="introduction"> <p>The main issue with this type of monopoly is the large amounts of power and influence it
<h2><a href="#introduction">Introduction</a></h2> gives Chromium, which can lead to, and is leading to, excessive authority of how the web should
<p>It's no secret that I'm an advocate of Chromium and will use it for the work, and the standards which are implemented, which all other web browsers must comply with in
foreseeable future. It is a highly secure web browser which provides strong order to have a fully working web.</p>
protection against malicious wesbites and the code they run, and, while I am not </section>
too interested in high performance, it is a very performant web browser, despite <section id="solution">
its security features.</p> <h2><a href="#solution">Solution</a></h2>
<p>However, the intention of this blog post is not to promote Chromium for any <p>In order to combat the Chromium monopoly, users typically go over to Chromium's classical
reason, but rather show an issue with it; an issue which is larger than may be rival, Firefox. However, Firefox is dying and has lost almost all of its userbase over the last
realised by web-surfing users. That issue is the large monopoly Chromium has in 2-3 years; the reason for this is a tale of selfishness and greed, caused by Firefox's parent
the web browser market; company to go off course and lose its original goal of providing a freedom-respecting, open web.
<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Usage_share_of_web_browsers#Summary_tables">Chromium's market share is around 65%</a>, Mozilla caused self-inflicted damage which it cannot recover from, and, to me, is already dead.
making it the largest slice of the cake. The issue becomes even deeper and more The vultures are simply waiting for the final, small group of users to abandon the project
problematic when you realise that the second-place web browser, Safari, has only before Firefox finally succumbs to its own demise; the demise it caused itself.</p>
an 18% market share.</p> <p>If attempting to increase Firefox's market share to previous levels will be in vain, what is
<p>The main issue with this type of monopoly is the large amounts of power and the solution? How can we prevent Chromium from completely taking over the web and dictating
influence it gives Chromium, which can lead to, and is leading to, excessive everything we do and how the web should be designed and used?</p>
authority of how the web should work, and the standards which are implemented, <p>To find the answer to these important but difficult questions, we must go to the alternatives
which all other web browsers must comply with in order to have a fully working which still have a fighting chance. Safari, developed by Apple, is based on WebKit, an engine
web.</p> completely independent of Chromium and Firefox.</p>
</section> <p>Just using a non-Chromium-based web browser is not enough; the choice must already have
<section id="solution"> enough market share to still be relevant, and be capable of gaining new users. Safari, being
<h2><a href="#solution">Solution</a></h2> preinstalled on Apple devices including iPhone and Mac, already has a great advantage over
<p>In order to combat the Chromium monopoly, users typically go over to Firefox. Apple devices, especially iPhone, is abundant in streets everywhere on the planet.
Chromium's classical rival, Firefox. However, Firefox is dying and has lost Safari is the default choice for Apple users and has a large market share simply because of how
almost all of its userbase over the last 2-3 years; the reason for this is a widespread it is. Exploiting this fact is the only way to gain more market share and take down
tale of selfishness and greed, caused by Firefox's parent company to go off Chromium before it is too late; the clock is ticking, and Apple are the only ones preventing
course and lose its original goal of providing a freedom-respecting, open web. Chromium from completely taking over the web. Backing Safari instead of Firefox will keep the
Mozilla caused self-inflicted damage which it cannot recover from, and, to me, WebKit market share from falling to a critically low percentage, making it impossible to make a
is already dead. The vultures are simply waiting for the final, small group of comeback, as has happened to Firefox. Sometimes, directly supporting a political party is not
users to abandon the project before Firefox finally succumbs to its own demise; the way to get them into power, supporting the second-place alternative is, in order to keep the
the demise it caused itself.</p> one you don't want out of power, giving the party you do want in power an advantage. To win this
<p>If attempting to increase Firefox's market share to previous levels will be war against the Chromium monopoly, we must be tactical, not emotional.</p>
in vain, what is the solution? How can we prevent Chromium from completely </section>
taking over the web and dictating everything we do and how the web should be <section id="conclusion">
designed and used?</p> <h2><a href="#conclusion">Conclusion</a></h2>
<p>To find the answer to these important but difficult questions, we must go to <p>Supporting Safari is the first step in supporting WebKit and promoting usage of the
the alternatives which still have a fighting chance. Safari, developed by Apple, independent web engine. Buying time while supporting and contributing to WebKit browser projects
is based on WebKit, an engine completely independent of Chromium and is the best and only chance anyone has at competing with Chromium, and preventing it from
Firefox.</p> increasing its dominance to unstoppable levels, at which point there will be no return.</p>
<p>Just using a non-Chromium-based web browser is not enough; the choice must </section>
already have enough market share to still be relevant, and be capable of gaining <div class="sitemap-small"><a href="../sitemap">Sitemap</a></div>
new users. Safari, being preinstalled on Apple devices including iPhone and Mac, </body>
already has a great advantage over Firefox. Apple devices, especially iPhone, is
abundant in streets everywhere on the planet. Safari is the default choice for
Apple users and has a large market share simply because of how widespread it is.
Exploiting this fact is the only way to gain more market share and take down
Chromium before it is too late; the clock is ticking, and Apple are the only
ones preventing Chromium from completely taking over the web. Backing Safari
instead of Firefox will keep the WebKit market share from falling to a
critically low percentage, making it impossible to make a comeback, as has
happened to Firefox. Sometimes, directly supporting a political party is not the
way to get them into power, supporting the second-place alternative is, in order
to keep the one you don't want out of power, giving the party you do want in
power an advantage. To win this war against the Chromium monopoly, we must be
tactical, not emotional.</p>
</section>
<section id="conclusion">
<h2><a href="#conclusion">Conclusion</a></h2>
<p>Supporting Safari is the first step in supporting WebKit and promoting usage
of the independent web engine. Buying time while supporting and contributing to
WebKit browser projects is the best and only chance anyone has at competing with
Chromium, and preventing it from increasing its dominance to unstoppable levels,
at which point there will be no return.</p>
</section>
<div class="sitemap-small"><a href="../sitemap">Sitemap</a></div>
</body>
</html> </html>