Add headings for each issue. Change source link targets to Git issue comments rather than only the Git issues.
This commit is contained in:
parent
845e6ebab4
commit
64452b860e
@ -19,23 +19,29 @@
|
|||||||
<h2>systemd Insecurity</h2>
|
<h2>systemd Insecurity</h2>
|
||||||
<br>
|
<br>
|
||||||
<p>Posted: 2022-01-29 (UTC+00:00)</p>
|
<p>Posted: 2022-01-29 (UTC+00:00)</p>
|
||||||
<p>Updated: 2022-10-29 (UTC+00:00)</p>
|
<p>Updated: 2022-11-14 (UTC+00:00)</p>
|
||||||
<br>
|
<br>
|
||||||
<br>
|
<br>
|
||||||
<p>Anyone who cares about security may want to switch from systemd as soon as
|
<p>Anyone who cares about security may want to switch from systemd as soon as
|
||||||
possible; its lead developer doesn't care about your security at all.</p>
|
possible; its lead developer doesn't care about your security at all.</p>
|
||||||
<br>
|
<br>
|
||||||
|
<br>
|
||||||
|
<h3>Issue #0 - Against CVE Assignment</h3>
|
||||||
|
<br>
|
||||||
<p>Poettering:<br>
|
<p>Poettering:<br>
|
||||||
"You don't assign CVEs to every single random bugfix we do, do you?"</p>
|
"You don't assign CVEs to every single random bugfix we do, do you?"</p>
|
||||||
<br>
|
<br>
|
||||||
<p>My thoughts:<br>
|
<p>My thoughts:<br>
|
||||||
Yes, if they're security related.</p>
|
Yes, if they're security-related.</p>
|
||||||
<br>
|
<br>
|
||||||
<p>Source:<br>
|
<p>Source:<br>
|
||||||
<a class="body-link" href="https://github.com/systemd/systemd/pull/5998">https://github.com/systemd/systemd/pull/5998</a></p>
|
<a class="body-link" href="https://github.com/systemd/systemd/pull/5998#issuecomment-303782334"
|
||||||
|
>systemd GitHub Issue 5998</a></p>
|
||||||
<br>
|
<br>
|
||||||
<br>
|
<br>
|
||||||
<br>
|
<br>
|
||||||
|
<h3>Issue #1 - CVEs Are Not Useful</h3>
|
||||||
|
<br>
|
||||||
<p>Poettering:<br>
|
<p>Poettering:<br>
|
||||||
"Humpf, I am not convinced this is the right way to announce this.
|
"Humpf, I am not convinced this is the right way to announce this.
|
||||||
We never did that, and half the CVEs aren't useful anyway, hence I am not
|
We never did that, and half the CVEs aren't useful anyway, hence I am not
|
||||||
@ -49,19 +55,25 @@ found and their severity, so yes, it *is* the correct way to announce it.
|
|||||||
It seems as if over 95 security-concious people think the same.</p>
|
It seems as if over 95 security-concious people think the same.</p>
|
||||||
<br>
|
<br>
|
||||||
<p>Source:<br>
|
<p>Source:<br>
|
||||||
<a class="body-link" href="https://github.com/systemd/systemd/pull/6225">https://github.com/systemd/systemd/pull/6225</a></p>
|
<a class="body-link" href="https://github.com/systemd/systemd/pull/6225#issuecomment-311739869"
|
||||||
|
>systemd GitHub Issue 6225</a></p>
|
||||||
<br>
|
<br>
|
||||||
<br>
|
<br>
|
||||||
<br>
|
<br>
|
||||||
|
<h3>Issue #2 - Security is a Circus</h3>
|
||||||
|
<br>
|
||||||
<p>Poettering:<br>
|
<p>Poettering:<br>
|
||||||
"I am not sure I buy enough into the security circus to do that though for
|
"I am not sure I buy enough into the security circus to do that though for
|
||||||
any minor issue..."</p>
|
any minor issue..."</p>
|
||||||
<br>
|
<br>
|
||||||
<p>Source:<br>
|
<p>Source:<br>
|
||||||
<a class="body-link" href="https://github.com/systemd/systemd/issues/5144">https://github.com/systemd/systemd/issues/5144</a></p>
|
<a class="body-link" href="https://github.com/systemd/systemd/issues/5144#issuecomment-276740654"
|
||||||
|
>systemd GitHub Issue 5144</a></p>
|
||||||
<br>
|
<br>
|
||||||
<br>
|
<br>
|
||||||
<br>
|
<br>
|
||||||
|
<h3>Issue #3 - Blaming the User</h3>
|
||||||
|
<br>
|
||||||
<p>Poettering:<br>
|
<p>Poettering:<br>
|
||||||
"Yes, as you found out "0day" is not a valid username. I wonder which tool
|
"Yes, as you found out "0day" is not a valid username. I wonder which tool
|
||||||
permitted you to create it in the first place. Note that not permitting
|
permitted you to create it in the first place. Note that not permitting
|
||||||
@ -73,7 +85,7 @@ to generate invalid configuration. Hence, yes, it's a feature that we don't
|
|||||||
permit invalid user names, and I'd consider it a limitation of xinetd that
|
permit invalid user names, and I'd consider it a limitation of xinetd that
|
||||||
it doesn't refuse an invalid username.<br>
|
it doesn't refuse an invalid username.<br>
|
||||||
<br>
|
<br>
|
||||||
So, yeah, I don't think there's anything to fix in systemd here. I<
|
So, yeah, I don't think there's anything to fix in systemd here. I
|
||||||
understand this is annoying, but still: the username is clearly not valid."</p>
|
understand this is annoying, but still: the username is clearly not valid."</p>
|
||||||
<br>
|
<br>
|
||||||
<p>My thoughts:<br>
|
<p>My thoughts:<br>
|
||||||
@ -81,7 +93,8 @@ systemd was the thing that allowed root access just because a username
|
|||||||
started with a number, then Poettering blamed the user.</p>
|
started with a number, then Poettering blamed the user.</p>
|
||||||
<br>
|
<br>
|
||||||
<p>Source:<br>
|
<p>Source:<br>
|
||||||
<a class="body-link" href="https://github.com/systemd/systemd/issues/6237">https://github.com/systemd/systemd/issues/6237</a></p>
|
<a class="body-link" href="https://github.com/systemd/systemd/issues/6237#issuecomment-311900864"
|
||||||
|
>systemd GitHub Issue 6237</a></p>
|
||||||
<br>
|
<br>
|
||||||
<br>
|
<br>
|
||||||
</body>
|
</body>
|
||||||
|
Loading…
x
Reference in New Issue
Block a user