2022-12-20 02:19:21 +00:00
|
|
|
<!DOCTYPE html>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<!-- Inferencium - Website - Blog - #1 -->
|
|
|
|
|
|
2023-05-28 15:37:00 +01:00
|
|
|
<!-- Copyright 2022 Jake Winters -->
|
|
|
|
|
<!-- SPDX-License-Identifier: BSD-3-Clause -->
|
2022-12-20 02:19:21 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2023-06-26 02:59:47 +01:00
|
|
|
<!-- Version: 4.1.1.25 -->
|
2022-12-20 02:19:21 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<html>
|
2023-06-23 18:31:45 +01:00
|
|
|
<head>
|
|
|
|
|
<title>Inferencium - Blog - systemd Insecurity</title>
|
|
|
|
|
<link rel="stylesheet" href="../inf.css">
|
|
|
|
|
<meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width, initial-scale=1">
|
|
|
|
|
</head>
|
|
|
|
|
<!-- Navigation bar -->
|
|
|
|
|
<div class="sidebar">
|
|
|
|
|
<a href="../index.html"><img src="../asset/img/logo-inferencium-no_text.png" width="110px" height="110px"></a>
|
|
|
|
|
<a href="../index.html" class="title">Inferencium</a><br>
|
|
|
|
|
<br>
|
|
|
|
|
<br>
|
|
|
|
|
<div><a href="../about.html">About</a></div>
|
|
|
|
|
<div><a href="../contact.html">Contact</a></div>
|
|
|
|
|
<div><a href="../blog.html">Blog</a></div>
|
|
|
|
|
<div><a href="../source.html">Source</a></div>
|
|
|
|
|
<div><a href="../key.html">Key</a></div>
|
2023-06-26 02:59:47 +01:00
|
|
|
<div><a href="../changelog.html">Changelog</a></div>
|
2023-06-23 18:31:45 +01:00
|
|
|
</div>
|
|
|
|
|
<body>
|
|
|
|
|
<h1>Blog - #1</h1>
|
|
|
|
|
<h2>systemd Insecurity</h2>
|
|
|
|
|
<p class="update_date">Posted: 2022-01-29 (UTC+00:00)</p>
|
|
|
|
|
<p class="update_date">Updated: 2022-11-14 (UTC+00:00)</p>
|
|
|
|
|
<!-- Table of contents -->
|
|
|
|
|
<section id="toc">
|
|
|
|
|
<h2 id="toc"><a href="#toc" class="h2">Table of Contents<a/></h2>
|
|
|
|
|
<ul>
|
|
|
|
|
<li><a href="#issue0" class="body-link">Issue #0 - Against CVE Assignment</a></li>
|
|
|
|
|
<li><a href="#issue1" class="body-link">Issue #1 - CVEs Are Not Useful</a></li>
|
|
|
|
|
<li><a href="#issue2" class="body-link">Issue #2 - Security is a Circus</a></li>
|
|
|
|
|
<li><a href="#issue3" class="body-link">Issue #3 - Blaming the User</a></li>
|
|
|
|
|
</ul>
|
|
|
|
|
</section>
|
|
|
|
|
<p>Anyone who cares about security may want to switch from systemd as soon as possible; its lead
|
|
|
|
|
developer doesn't care about your security at all.</p>
|
|
|
|
|
<section id="issue0">
|
|
|
|
|
<h2 id="issue0"><a href="#issue0" class="h2">Issue #0 - Against CVE Assignment</a></h2>
|
|
|
|
|
<br>
|
|
|
|
|
<blockquote>"You don't assign CVEs to every single random bugfix we do, do you?"</blockquote>
|
|
|
|
|
<p>- Lennart Poettering, systemd lead developer</p>
|
|
|
|
|
<p>My thoughts:<br>
|
|
|
|
|
Yes, if they're security-related.</p>
|
|
|
|
|
<p>Source:<br>
|
|
|
|
|
<a href="https://github.com/systemd/systemd/pull/5998#issuecomment-303782334" class="body-link">systemd GitHub Issue 5998</a></p>
|
|
|
|
|
</section>
|
|
|
|
|
<section id="issue1">
|
|
|
|
|
<h2 id="issue1"><a href="#issue1" class="h2">Issue #1 - CVEs Are Not Useful</a></h2>
|
|
|
|
|
<blockquote>"Humpf, I am not convinced this is the right way to announce this. We never did that, and half the
|
|
|
|
|
CVEs aren't useful anyway, hence I am not sure we should start with that now, because it is either
|
|
|
|
|
inherently incomplete or blesses the nonsensical part of the CVE circus which we really shouldn't
|
|
|
|
|
bless..."</blockquote>
|
|
|
|
|
<p>- Lennart Poettering, systemd lead developer</p>
|
|
|
|
|
<p>My thoughts:<br>
|
|
|
|
|
CVEs are supposed to be for security, and a log of when they were found and their severity, so yes,
|
|
|
|
|
it *is* the correct way to announce it. It seems as if over 95 security-concious people think the
|
|
|
|
|
same.</p>
|
|
|
|
|
<p>Source:<br>
|
|
|
|
|
<a href="https://github.com/systemd/systemd/pull/6225#issuecomment-311739869" class="body-link">systemd GitHub Issue 6225</a></p>
|
|
|
|
|
</section>
|
|
|
|
|
<section id="issue2">
|
|
|
|
|
<h2 id="issue2"><a href="#issue2" class="h2">Issue #2 - Security is a Circus</a></h2>
|
|
|
|
|
<blockquote>"I am not sure I buy enough into the security circus to do that though for any minor
|
|
|
|
|
issue..."</blockquote>
|
|
|
|
|
<p>- Lennart Poettering, systemd lead developer</p>
|
|
|
|
|
<p>Source:<br>
|
|
|
|
|
<a href="https://github.com/systemd/systemd/issues/5144#issuecomment-276740654" class="body-link">systemd GitHub Issue 5144</a></p>
|
|
|
|
|
</section>
|
|
|
|
|
<section id="issue3">
|
|
|
|
|
<h2 id="issue3"><a href="#issue3" class="h2">Issue #3 - Blaming the User</a></h2>
|
|
|
|
|
<blockquote>"Yes, as you found out "0day" is not a valid username. I wonder which tool permitted you to create
|
|
|
|
|
it in the first place. Note that not permitting numeric first characters is done on purpose: to
|
|
|
|
|
avoid ambiguities between numeric UID and textual user names.
|
|
|
|
|
<br>
|
|
|
|
|
systemd will validate all configuration data you drop at it, making it hard to generate invalid
|
|
|
|
|
configuration. Hence, yes, it's a feature that we don't permit invalid user names, and I'd consider
|
|
|
|
|
it a limitation of xinetd that it doesn't refuse an invalid username.<br>
|
|
|
|
|
<br>
|
|
|
|
|
So, yeah, I don't think there's anything to fix in systemd here. I understand this is annoying, but
|
|
|
|
|
still: the username is clearly not valid."</blockquote>
|
|
|
|
|
<p>- Lennart Poettering, systemd lead developer</p>
|
|
|
|
|
<p>My thoughts:<br>
|
|
|
|
|
systemd was the thing that allowed root access just because a username started with a number, then
|
|
|
|
|
Poettering blamed the user.</p>
|
|
|
|
|
<p>Source:<br>
|
|
|
|
|
<a href="https://github.com/systemd/systemd/issues/6237#issuecomment-311900864" class="body-link">systemd GitHub Issue 6237</a></p>
|
|
|
|
|
</section>
|
|
|
|
|
</body>
|
2022-12-20 02:19:21 +00:00
|
|
|
</html>
|
